The Canadian election, set to take place on October 21st, has been marked by a growing trend of politicians trying to emulate the tactics of US President Donald Trump. From controversial statements to divisive rhetoric, many candidates have attempted to ride the wave of populism that Trump has successfully tapped into. However, as the election draws near, it is becoming increasingly clear that this strategy may not yield the desired results. In fact, the Canadian election may prove to be another object lesson in the pitfalls of trying to do Trumpism without Trump.
The rise of Trumpism in Canada can be traced back to the success of right-wing populist parties in Europe, such as the National Front in France and the Alternative for Germany. These parties have tapped into the frustrations of citizens who feel left behind by globalization and the changing social and economic landscape. In Canada, this sentiment has been echoed by the rise of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), led by Maxime Bernier, who has been dubbed the “Canadian Trump.”
Like Trump, Bernier has taken a hardline stance on immigration, promising to reduce the number of immigrants and refugees allowed into Canada. He has also criticized multiculturalism and climate change, echoing Trump’s rhetoric on these issues. However, while Trump has been able to rally a significant base of supporters with his controversial statements, Bernier’s attempts to do the same have been met with backlash and criticism.
One of the major pitfalls of trying to do Trumpism without Trump is that it often comes across as inauthentic and insincere. Trump’s brash and unapologetic style is unique to him and trying to replicate it can often seem forced and contrived. This has been evident in the Canadian election, where candidates who have tried to mimic Trump’s bombastic approach have been met with skepticism and even ridicule from the public.
Moreover, Trump’s success in the US can also be attributed to his celebrity status and his ability to dominate the media landscape. However, in Canada, where the media landscape is vastly different, attempts to replicate this strategy have not been as successful. Instead, candidates who have focused on sensationalism and controversy have been overshadowed by those who have focused on policy and substance.
Another pitfall of trying to do Trumpism without Trump is that it can alienate a significant portion of the electorate. While Trump has been able to galvanize his base, he has also polarized the country, with many Americans fiercely opposing his policies and rhetoric. In Canada, where political discourse is generally more civil, attempts to emulate Trump’s divisive tactics have been met with pushback from voters who value inclusivity and diversity.
As the Canadian election approaches, it is becoming increasingly clear that Trumpism may not be a winning strategy in this country. The recent controversy surrounding the PPC’s inclusion in the national debates, as well as the backlash to Bernier’s comments on diversity, are indications that Canadians are not receptive to this type of politics. In fact, many voters are looking for a leader who can unite the country and bring people together, rather than further dividing them.
In conclusion, the Canadian election may prove to be another object lesson in the pitfalls of trying to do Trumpism without Trump. While some candidates have attempted to emulate Trump’s tactics, they have been met with resistance and criticism from the public. This election serves as a reminder that each country has its own unique political landscape and what works in one may not necessarily work in another. Ultimately, Canadians will have to decide for themselves whether they want a leader who embraces Trumpism or one who offers a different vision for the country.
